By: DoctorChimRichalds
Someone didn’t read the opinion. Roberts very clearly addresses the idea of a “backbreaking tax” at 35-38.
View ArticleBy: Mander Marsh
I followed the ACA news closely today. I don’t work in politics, law, or health care, so I wound up spending time on several websites I don’t usually visit. I learned a lot of new things. Clicking...
View ArticleBy: 8k JD
The mandate does not apply if annual income is below 10k, or if the cheapest insurance is 8% or more of annual income. So most lawyers will never have to pay this tax.
View ArticleBy: Joe
That’s true. Of course it does mean that they get to spin their repeal votes as Democrats voting against a multibillion dollar tax cut that would primarily help some of the very poorest Americans.
View ArticleBy: Guest
That makes no sense. If something is “massively unpopular,” then it won’t be enacted in a democracy. My point about the health care law is that it is imperfect and “not really liked” by anyone,...
View ArticleBy: Annoyed
Absolutely. Roberts “sided” with the liberals to get the law written in a fashion where he knew it would cost Obama the election and then have the “tax” challenged once imposed. Brilliant.
View ArticleBy: Guest
Wow Elie is more popular than almost all the world leaders (except those 99% of the vote dictators).
View Article
